Shakespeare and the Jacobean Era

The reign of James I was the time of disillusionment and pessimism. The status expected stability and security from the new great(p) index and tangle let discomfit when he appeared to be less(prenominal) of a objet dart than his predecessor, Elizabeth I, was. Even though James I scorned war he thought himself to be the fagot of kings. He considered himself a Solomon-like figure, his wisdom rising above the uprightness (coming down to London from Scotland he had a cutpurse hanged with roll out trial in Newark because he had found the man guilty). He was given to homosexuality, and kindle in witchcraft. The only issue he want rough England was its church: he back up his bishops fervently and they supported him in return. The literary works of the era differs from the literature of the Elizabethan period non so much in property as in degree: it became growingly much serious, somber, soci entirelyy engaged, and aware of corruption. The break aways got much sophisti cated, more passionate and violent, and they investigated more deep the matter of homosexual weakness. Shakespeares Jacobean phase shows great divergency from his Elizabethan phase. During this period he wrote a number of his great tragedies (Othello, King Lear, Macbeth, Coriolanus, Anthony and Cleopatra), his dark, problem comedies gratis(p) of careless gaiety, all of his tragicomic romances, and all this in a short space of time. The tragedies arrestm to arrive been composed from 1604 to 1608. Othello, with its scratch line performance in 1604, was mayhap written while Elizabeth was console alive. From 1608 to 1612 he wrote the tragicomic romances, the enigmatical and puzzling nature of which indicates that he was experimenting with old and new put conventions. It is easy to oversimplify the reasons for this press and try to explain it from the nous of view of the writers private intent or the political changes. However, unrivalled thing that remains original is t hat Shakespeare was a man who evermore live! d with his time and sought to di late(a) new forms. James I was non a warrior-king and Shakespeare knew that he would no longer be satisfactory to write such fire-snorting plays as Henry V. So, as Jonson became more interested in the social matters, Shakespeare turned to the proper subject area of human nature, and he proved he was good at it. The king was a great lover of arts. What he liked best were masques. Masques had in them much of morality interlude, with virtues and vices represented symbolically (virtues always winning, of course). They were one act pieces and unlike in the undefiled theater women could play in them. Shakespeare could have made a fortune out of them. However, the artist seems to have got the better of the man, and he never wrote a single masque. He remained faithful to his tail fin act tragedies and the king though so highly of the headmaster Chamberlains Men that he changed their name to the Kings Men and paid them twice the sum the late queen El izabeth used to pay to see them play. Thus Shakespeares company were at the height of their prosperity during the Jacobean age. Shakespeare continued to write his plays for the formal, for proud command purposes and for the indoor force field at Blackfriars, and it was at the Globe and the Blackfriars that Shakespeare reached the pinnacle of his career. He had everything he could have ever treasured and he proceeded to represent human life as tragedy. If you need to get a total essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay